New Lisbon School District
New Lisbon School District is located close to the center of Wisconsin. New Lisbon School District has 113.50 square miles of land area and 0.52 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total New Lisbon School District population is 5,231. New Lisbon School District median household income is $45,042 in 2010-2014. New Lisbon School District median house value is $113,700 in 2010-2014. On average, New Lisbon School District is worse than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
New Lisbon School District Map, Border, and Nearby Locations
500 South Forest St
New Lisbon WI, 53950, Juneau County
Phone: 608-562-3700
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 665 | 639 | 636 | 664 | 631 | 646 | 657 |
English Language Learner Students: | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Teachers: | 50.65 | 51.54 | 51.66 | 52.37 | 55.60 | 52.20 | 52.20 |
Prekindergarten: | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.50 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
Kindergarten: | 3.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 |
Elementary: | 18.45 | 19.27 | 20.42 | 20.62 | 20.85 | 19.90 | 20.90 |
Secondary: | 27.20 | 28.27 | 26.24 | 26.75 | 28.25 | 27.30 | 26.30 |
Ungraded: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Total Other Staff: | 34.11 | 32.62 | 33.27 | 35.27 | 34.32 | 42.10 | 41.10 |
Instructional Aides: | 9.00 | 8.00 | 9.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 1.10 | 0.10 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 1.90 | 1.95 | 1.95 | 2.95 | 1.95 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 1.15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.95 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 1.95 | 1.95 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
District Administrators: | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.40 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 1.70 |
District Administrative Support: | 2.60 | 2.50 | 2.50 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 |
School Administrators: | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.30 | 1.30 |
School Administrative Support: | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
Student Support Services: | 3.14 | 3.04 | 3.06 | 3.35 | 3.10 | 3.40 | 2.40 |
Other Support Services: | 11.37 | 11.08 | 10.71 | 10.52 | 10.52 | 16.60 | 16.60 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 13.13 | 12.40 | 12.31 | 12.68 | 11.35 | 12.38 | 12.59 |
Schools
Juneau County Charter School | Grade 7 to Grade 12 | N11003 17th Ave, Necedah WI 54646 | |
New Lisbon Elementary | Prekindergarten to Grade 6 | 500 South Forest St, New Lisbon WI 53950 | |
New Lisbon Junior High/High School | Grade 7 to Grade 12 | 500 South Forest St, New Lisbon WI 53950 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
WKCE Test | |||||
2004 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 62% | 67% |
2006 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 61% | 70% |
2008 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 54% | 73% |
2009 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 67% | 73% |
2010 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 61% | 71% |
2011 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 62% | 74% |
2012 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 74% | 73% |
2013 | Language Arts | 10th Grade | % met std | 81% | 76% |
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 67% | 69% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 71% | 70% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 63% | 72% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 69% | 72% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 59% | 73% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 61% | 74% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 74% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 46% | 47% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 69% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 74% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 67% | 76% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 65% | 77% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 75% | 78% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 66% | 77% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 45% | 40% |
2004 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 68% | 70% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 64% | 70% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 73% | 75% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 65% | 74% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 58% | 73% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 63% | 76% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 76% | 75% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 85% | 78% |
2004 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 80% | 73% |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 66% | 74% |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 66% | 79% |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 67% | 78% |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 64% | 77% |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 70% | 82% |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 87% | 78% |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 78% | 82% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 72% | 75% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 64% | 78% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 76% | 77% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 69% | 75% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80% | 78% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 37% | 50% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 69% | 81% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 69% | 80% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 76% | 81% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75% | 81% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 78% | 81% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 42% | 35% |
2004 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 54% | 78% |
2005 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 64% | 78% |
2007 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 70% | 76% |
2008 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 59% | 77% |
2009 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 58% | 78% |
2010 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 69% | 78% |
2011 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 71% | 77% |
2012 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 77% | 78% |
2013 | Language Arts | 4th Grade | % met std | 73% | 77% |
2004 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 49% | 73% |
2005 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 66% | 71% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 74% | 77% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 81% | 78% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 73% | 82% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 68% | 81% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 80% | 81% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 83% | 81% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 48% | 50% |
2004 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 65% | 81% |
2005 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 73% | 81% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 74% | 81% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 81% | 82% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 68% | 83% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 66% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 83% | 84% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 77% | 83% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 32% | 33% |
2004 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 67% | 80% |
2005 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 79% | 78% |
2007 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 70% | 77% |
2008 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 76% | 77% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 63% | 77% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 64% | 79% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 78% | 79% |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 92% | 79% |
2013 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 78% | 79% |
2004 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 82% | 90% |
2005 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 93% | 91% |
2007 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 84% | 91% |
2008 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% |
2009 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 81% | 92% |
2010 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 87% | 93% |
2011 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 94% | 92% |
2012 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 97% | 93% |
2013 | Social Studies | 4th Grade | % met std | 92% | 92% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 71% | 77% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 86% | 79% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 65% | 79% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 62% | 80% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 78% | 81% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 45% | 52% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 82% | 85% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 68% | 82% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 52% | 81% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 71% | 85% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 81% | 81% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 29% | 36% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 71% | 72% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 84% | 77% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 70% | 77% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 68% | 79% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 75% | 81% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 64% | 79% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 55% | 54% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 86% | 82% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 91% | 86% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 81% | 84% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 81% | 84% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 85% | 87% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 77% | 84% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 24% | 35% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 81% | 73% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 66% | 78% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 65% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 81% | 80% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 76% | 80% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 73% | 82% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 20% | 49% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 82% | 83% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 79% | 84% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 74% | 86% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 91% | 87% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 84% | 87% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 85% | 87% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 69% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 20% | 38% |
2004 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 68% | 67% |
2006 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 47% | 65% |
2009 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 56% | 65% |
2010 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 66% | 66% |
2011 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 69% | 63% |
2012 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 51% | 66% |
2013 | Language Arts | 8th Grade | % met std | 69% | 61% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 68% | 65% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 63% | 73% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 70% | 80% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 84% | 80% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 80% | 80% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 61% | 81% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 36% | 46% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 93% | 79% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 84% | 83% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 81% | 86% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 89% | 85% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 83% | 88% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 83% | 85% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 39% | 42% |
2004 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 64% | 69% |
2006 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 64% | 73% |
2009 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 68% | 78% |
2010 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 82% | 82% |
2011 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 78% | 79% |
2012 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 83% | 82% |
2013 | Science | 8th Grade | % met std | 82% | 79% |
2004 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 93% | 84% |
2006 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 75% | 83% |
2009 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 73% | 83% |
2010 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 89% | 82% |
2011 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 83% | 83% |
2012 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 83% | 82% |
2013 | Social Studies | 8th Grade | % met std | 85% | 83% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $9,111,000 | $14,325 | $9,027,000 | $13,595 | $8,993,000 | $14,252 | |||
Federal: | $815,000 | $1,281 | 8.9% | $593,000 | $893 | 6.6% | $807,000 | $1,279 | 9.0% |
State: | $3,623,000 | $5,697 | 39.8% | $3,873,000 | $5,833 | 42.9% | $3,452,000 | $5,471 | 38.4% |
Local: | $4,673,000 | $7,347 | 51.3% | $4,561,000 | $6,869 | 50.5% | $4,734,000 | $7,502 | 52.6% |
Total Expenditures: | $8,159,000 | $12,829 | $8,402,000 | $12,654 | $8,439,000 | $13,374 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $6,827,000 | $10,734 | $7,259,000 | $10,932 | $7,231,000 | $11,460 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $4,052,000 | $6,371 | 59.4% | $4,387,000 | $6,607 | 60.4% | $4,401,000 | $6,975 | 60.9% |
Student and Staff Support: | $443,000 | $697 | 6.5% | $482,000 | $726 | 6.6% | $420,000 | $666 | 5.8% |
Administration: | $978,000 | $1,538 | 14.3% | $1,062,000 | $1,599 | 14.6% | $1,088,000 | $1,724 | 15.0% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $1,354,000 | $2,129 | 19.8% | $1,328,000 | $2,000 | 18.3% | $1,322,000 | $2,095 | 18.3% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $204,000 | $321 | $34,000 | $51 | $8,000 | $13 | |||
Construction: | $28,000 | $44 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Total Other: | $28,000 | $44 | $42,000 | $63 | $35,000 | $55 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $208,000 | $327 | $228,000 | $343 | $286,000 | $453 | |||
Total Salary: | $3,454,000 | $5,431 | $3,532,000 | $5,319 | $3,549,000 | $5,624 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $2,496,000 | $3,925 | 72.3% | $2,538,000 | $3,822 | 71.9% | $2,563,000 | $4,062 | 72.2% |
Other Salary: | $958,000 | $1,506 | 27.7% | $994,000 | $1,497 | 28.1% | $986,000 | $1,563 | 27.8% |
Total Benefit: | $1,913,000 | $3,008 | $2,280,000 | $3,434 | $2,349,000 | $3,723 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $1,396,000 | $2,195 | 73.0% | $1,627,000 | $2,450 | 71.4% | $1,653,000 | $2,620 | 70.4% |
Other Benefit: | $517,000 | $813 | 27.0% | $653,000 | $983 | 28.6% | $696,000 | $1,103 | 29.6% |
* New Lisbon School District was rated 1 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.