Chaney-Monge School District 88
Chaney-Monge School District 88 is located in northeast Illinois. Chaney-Monge School District 88 has 4.46 square miles of land area and 0.07 square miles of water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Chaney-Monge School District 88 population is 7,237. Chaney-Monge School District 88 median household income is $56,672 in 2010-2014. Chaney-Monge School District 88 median house value is $135,600 in 2010-2014. On average, Chaney-Monge School District 88 is worse than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Chaney-Monge School District 88 Map and Nearby Locations
400 Elsie Ave
Crest Hill IL, 60403, Will County
Phone: 815-722-6673
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 450 | 466 | 481 | 486 | 494 | 482 | 452 |
English Language Learner Students: | 80 | 63 | 37 | 33 | 17 | 0 | 5 |
Total Teachers: | 27.00 | NA | 27.00 | 26.20 | 26.00 | 26.00 | 23.00 |
Prekindergarten: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Kindergarten: | NA | NA | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Elementary: | 27.00 | NA | 26.00 | 26.20 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 15.00 |
Secondary: | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 7.00 |
Ungraded: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA |
Total Other Staff: | 8.00 | 10.98 | 4.20 | 3.18 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 7.00 |
Instructional Aides: | NA | 4.03 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 1.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
District Administrators: | 2.00 | NA | 1.00 | 1.09 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
District Administrative Support: | NA | 2.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
School Administrators: | 1.00 | NA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
School Administrative Support: | NA | 0.02 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Student Support Services: | NA | NA | 2.20 | 1.09 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Other Support Services: | 4.00 | 4.93 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 3.00 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 16.67 | NA | 17.81 | 18.55 | 19.00 | 18.54 | 19.65 |
Schools
Chaney Elementary School | Kindergarten to Grade 5 | 400 Elsie Ave, Crest Hill IL 60403 | |
Monge Jr High School | Grade 6 to Grade 8 | 400 Elsie Ave, Crest Hill IL 60403 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
ISAT Test | |||||
2003 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 65.3% | 75.7% |
2004 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 69.6% | 79.1% |
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 57.7% | 79.3% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 83.8% | 85.6% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 82.3% | 86.7% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 77.8% | 85.1% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75.9% | 85.2% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 70.4% | 86.4% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 68% | 87.3% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 64.2% | 87.7% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 22.3% | 54.8% |
2003 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 53.1% | 62.0% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 51.1% | 65.1% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 55.8% | 66.6% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 72.1% | 70.7% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 64.7% | 72.9% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 62.9% | 71.8% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 55.2% | 72.2% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 65.9% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 63.9% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 47.2% | 58.8% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 70.9% | 84.8% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 84.7% | 86.4% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 78.9% | 84.6% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 76.8% | 85.8% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 61.7% | 85.9% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 76.0% | 87.7% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 74.5% | 88.1% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 32.0% | 60.2% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 40.0% | 72.9% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 65.2% | 73.7% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 57.9% | 73.2% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 73.8% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 54.3% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 58.7% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 63.0% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 38.8% | 59.2% |
2003 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 64.7% | 66.5% |
2004 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 55.2% | 67.8% |
2005 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 51.9% | 71.4% |
2006 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 70.9% | 79.9% |
2007 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 67.4% | 79.7% |
2008 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 57.9% | 76.2% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 67.8% | 76.8% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 58.3% | 76.6% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 69.6% | 79.4% |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 68.1% | 79.8% |
2013 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 56.0% | 80.9% |
2003 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 40.4% | 68.3% |
2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 52.1% | 71.8% |
2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 35.7% | 73.2% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 74% | 78.6% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 72.6% | 82.5% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 67.4% | 81.3% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 54.8% | 82.5% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 70.2% | 83.4% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 61.8% | 84.0% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 54.2% | 83.6% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 40.9% | 59.4% |
2003 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 51.9% | 60.4% |
2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 40.4% | 60.9% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 39.2% | 62.7% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 56% | 68.5% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 56.8% | 69.7% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 60.9% | 73.6% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 58.1% | 73.5% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 70.2% | 74.7% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 76.4% | 76.4% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 60.4% | 77.8% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 38.6% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 63.8% | 79.1% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 68.9% | 81.4% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 82.7% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 82.4% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 60.7% | 84.6% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 69.5% | 83.9% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 58.2% | 84.9% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 19.2% | 59.6% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 67.3% | 72.8% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 57.7% | 73.4% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 61.4% | 79.1% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 79.5% | 79.9% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 70.5% | 81.2% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 74.6% | 84.1% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 76.4% | 81.7% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 28.8% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 61.6% | 76.0% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 62.7% | 79.4% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 72.1% | 80.4% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 60.4% | 82.7% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 83% | 84.4% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 68.2% | 84.3% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 67.7% | 84.6% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 24.1% | 59.1% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 70% | 72% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 54.3% | 73.3% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 63.6% | 77.7% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 62.1% | 77.5% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 69.8% | 77.4% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 58.7% | 78.8% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 69.4% | 78.1% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 35.2% | 58.5% |
2003 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 76.1% | 73.7% |
2004 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 83.9% | 74.4% |
2005 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 74.5% | 74.6% |
2006 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.3% | 80.9% |
2007 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 65.5% | 79.3% |
2008 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 70.5% | 79.2% |
2009 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 75.8% | 79.5% |
2010 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 82.4% |
2011 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 74.6% | 81.9% |
2012 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 85.5% | 79.9% |
2013 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 66.0% | 79.0% |
2003 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 52.9% | 53.1% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 46.9% | 54.4% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 49.2% | 54.3% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 69.4% | 78.2% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 79.7% | 81.3% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 67.7% | 80.3% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 81.7% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 73.0% | 83.7% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 75.9% | 86.3% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 75% | 85.0% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 24.1% | 58.9% |
2003 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 54.8% | 63.7% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 69.4% | 67.1% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 71.2% | 72.8% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 63.2% | 79.2% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 78.0% | 81.7% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 69.3% | 81.4% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 73.3% | 83.6% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 76.2% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 68.9% | 85.0% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 76.7% | 86.2% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 46.5% | 59.8% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $4,722,000 | $9,817 | $4,825,000 | $9,928 | $4,456,000 | $9,020 | |||
Federal: | $324,000 | $674 | 6.9% | $420,000 | $864 | 8.7% | $568,000 | $1,150 | 12.7% |
State: | $2,484,000 | $5,164 | 52.6% | $2,484,000 | $5,111 | 51.5% | $2,000,000 | $4,049 | 44.9% |
Local: | $1,914,000 | $3,979 | 40.5% | $1,921,000 | $3,953 | 39.8% | $1,888,000 | $3,822 | 42.4% |
Total Expenditures: | $4,716,000 | $9,805 | $4,686,000 | $9,642 | $4,412,000 | $8,931 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $4,513,000 | $9,383 | $4,298,000 | $8,844 | $4,085,000 | $8,269 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $2,897,000 | $6,023 | 64.2% | $2,528,000 | $5,202 | 58.8% | $2,483,000 | $5,026 | 60.8% |
Student and Staff Support: | $324,000 | $674 | 7.2% | $337,000 | $693 | 7.8% | $314,000 | $636 | 7.7% |
Administration: | $544,000 | $1,131 | 12.1% | $631,000 | $1,298 | 14.7% | $593,000 | $1,200 | 14.5% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $748,000 | $1,555 | 16.6% | $802,000 | $1,650 | 18.7% | $695,000 | $1,407 | 17.0% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $69,000 | $143 | $167,000 | $344 | $93,000 | $188 | |||
Construction: | $4,000 | $8 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Total Other: | $1,000 | $2 | $4,000 | $8 | $3,000 | $6 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $10,000 | $21 | $16,000 | $33 | $31,000 | $63 | |||
Total Salary: | $2,407,000 | $5,004 | $2,203,000 | $4,533 | $2,053,000 | $4,156 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $1,746,000 | $3,630 | 72.5% | $1,552,000 | $3,193 | 70.4% | $1,495,000 | $3,026 | 72.8% |
Other Salary: | $661,000 | $1,374 | 27.5% | $651,000 | $1,340 | 29.6% | $558,000 | $1,130 | 27.2% |
Total Benefit: | $846,000 | $1,759 | $825,000 | $1,698 | $817,000 | $1,654 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $589,000 | $1,225 | 69.6% | $542,000 | $1,115 | 65.7% | $559,000 | $1,132 | 68.4% |
Other Benefit: | $257,000 | $534 | 30.4% | $283,000 | $582 | 34.3% | $258,000 | $522 | 31.6% |
* Chaney-Monge School District 88 was rated 1 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.